Artificial Intelligence Gaming GPUs Graphics Reviews

MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Gaming Trio OC Review – Quieter and a little more colorful is always possible

Total power consumption and compliance with standards in practice

The power consumption in idle mode of around 14 to 17 watts shows that NVIDIA could also further optimize the drivers here. Under load, the measured values are within the expected range. In some demanding games, the maximum power consumption reaches up to 265 watts and is then even slightly above the TDP limit. The use of DLSS, especially in combination with multi-frame generation (MFG), also helps to reduce energy consumption. The targeted reduction of the render load using AI-supported technologies noticeably reduces the load on the GPU without significantly affecting the image quality.

The mainboard slot, also known as the PCIe slot (PEG: PCI Express Graphics), is designed for a maximum current of 5.5 amps at a voltage of 12 volts in accordance with the PCI-SIG standard. This corresponds to a maximum power consumption of 66 watts, which can be supplied directly via the slot. The PCI-SIG standard serves as the basis for ensuring a uniform and reliable power supply via the mainboard slot while maintaining system stability. The specified limit value of 5.5 amps also takes into account short-term peak loads that can occur during abrupt load changes. However, these load peaks must not overload the system or affect other components due to voltage fluctuations.

The graphics card in question, which does not push the limits of the power supply even when using the modern 12V2X6 power connector design, demonstrates particularly efficient load distribution. The PEG slot is only loaded with a maximum of 0.6 amps, which corresponds to far less than 10 watts. This minimal load on the mainboard slot underlines the efficiency of the card and significantly reduces potential thermal loads or damage to the mainboard. The card therefore not only contributes to system stability, but also demonstrates well thought-out energy management that optimally distributes the load between different power sources.

Detailed view of gaming in Ultra HD

In Cyberpunk 2077, the graphics card reaches peak values of up to 268 watts in UHD and maximum settings. This high load is caused by the immense computing requirements without AI-supported scaling and requires a stable power supply. Although the 12V2X6 design is not fully utilized, it still places high demands on power supply stability. The power consumption and current levels are measured at 20 ms intervals in order to capture even rapid load changes.

The first graph shows the real-time consumption as a product of current and voltage, which allows conclusions to be drawn about peak values and compliance with the PCIe specifications. The second graph focuses on the current distribution between the PEG slot and external connections such as 12V2X6. It provides information on how heavily the mainboard slot is used and in which situations external connections have to supply more power.

The combination of both analyses provides a comprehensive view of the graphics card’s energy flows. While the power consumption evaluates the overall efficiency, the power distribution shows possible load peaks. This data is essential for developers and enthusiasts to precisely understand the power management of the card.

The next graphs analyze a single 20 ms interval with a resolution of 10 µs and show in detail the behavior of the power supply during short-term load changes. These are caused by sudden GPU requirements, such as render spikes or frame changes. The first graph visualizes the power consumption in this extremely short period of time and reveals short-term peaks of up to 500 watts, which place high demands on the stability and response speed of the power supply unit.

The second graph shows the current flow through the supply cables and reveals abrupt changes under dynamic loads. These measurements illustrate the importance of the ATX 3.1 standard, which requires a power reserve of 200% for short load peaks. As modern GPUs place extremely high demands in peak load situations, a sufficient power supply reserve is crucial in order to avoid voltage dips and ensure system stability.

Load behavior in the Torture Test

Furmark is an extreme load test for graphics cards that generates an atypically constant maximum load, far above what occurs in real applications or games. Through intensive calculations, both the shader and memory controllers are fully utilized, which leads to extreme thermal and electrical stress. This worst-case test checks the stability of the GPU and the power supply, whereby the power consumption can also significantly exceed the specified TDP of 250 watts and reach peak values of up to 302 watts.

As Furmark generates a permanent maximum load, the test is not representative for everyday use, but it is extremely useful for uncovering weak points in the cooling or power supply. Furmark therefore serves as a stress test to ensure that the entire system remains stable even under extreme conditions.

The high-resolution measurements during a Furmark test provide precise insights into the behavior of the power supply and power consumption under extreme load. The continuous maximum load on the GPU results in constant thermal and electrical stress, which is analyzed at microsecond intervals. Particularly noticeable are short-term load peaks that far exceed the average power consumption and are caused by sudden changes in the load of individual GPU components.

These measurements are particularly relevant with regard to the ATX 3.1 standard, which requires power supply units to compensate for short-term peaks of up to 200% of the nominal load for up to 1 millisecond. The data shows that such peaks are not only theoretically possible, but actually occur and can severely stress the limits of power supply designs.

Summary of the load peaks and a power supply recommendation

A power supply unit with a rated output of at least 550 to preferably 650 watts, which meets the requirements of the ATX 3.1 standard, is a suitable choice to reliably cover the power consumption values and load scenarios described. The maximum peak loads of the graphics card, which can reach up to almost 270 watts in extreme situations such as Furmark or very demanding games, make a high power reserve necessary. Together with the load of the rest of the system, such as the CPU, RAM and other components, this results in a requirement that can be up to around 600 to 650 watts in very short peak times.

 

A 650 watt power supply unit not only offers sufficient headroom, but also absorbs short-term load peaks, as required by the ATX 3.1 standard with up to 200% of the nominal load for one millisecond. This means that peaks of up to 1300 watts can be handled without stability problems. The dimensioning also ensures that the power supply operates in an efficient load range between 50 and 70 %, which optimizes energy efficiency and longevity. An 80 PLUS Platinum or Titanium certification also ensures low heat generation and high efficiency. Thanks to support for modern standards such as 12V2X6, the power supply is future-proof and offers long-term stability for upcoming high-performance graphics cards and hardware upgrades.

 

Kommentar

Lade neue Kommentare

Smartengine

Veteran

197 Kommentare 218 Likes

:unsure: Guten Morgen.
Gibt es einen speziellen Grund warum hier die 9070er in dem Vergleich fehlen?

Antwort 5 Likes

Karsten Rabeneck-Ketme

Moderator

317 Kommentare 136 Likes

Vielen Dank. Wie immer, ein toller Bericht! Ich mag die MSI Karten ;)

Antwort 1 Like

e
eastcoast_pete

Urgestein

3,083 Kommentare 2,046 Likes

Eigentlich eine interessante Karte, leider macht Nvidia wieder denselben Blödsinn wie bei Ada: die -70er GPU kriegt nur 12 GB VRAM, während es wohl eine 5060Ti Variante mit 16 GB geben wird. Also gibt's dann wieder die kleinere GPU mit mehr VRAM, obwohl die 16 GB der 5070 deutlich helfen würden.
Und bei dem Satz mußte ich schmunzeln: "mittels eines angebrachten Wärmeleitpads zusätzlich die Platine, natürlich mal wieder an der falschen Stelle. " Ich stelle mir das so ähnlich vor, als ob man einem Baby beim Wechseln die frische Windel um den Kopf packt. Eigentlich die richtige Maßnahme, aber eher nutzlos, da an der falschen Stelle.

Antwort 2 Likes

P
Pheenox

Veteran

128 Kommentare 97 Likes

Danke auch für die Einleitung vor den Benchmarks. Das finde ich eine wichtige Erkenntnis.
Ich vermisse in den Benchmarks jedoch die 9070er. Wurden diese aus einem besonderen Grund ausgespart?

Antwort Gefällt mir

Cerebral_Amoebe

Veteran

146 Kommentare 70 Likes

@Igor Wallossek
Der Anstieg bei 8kHz, ist das Spulenfiepen?

Antwort Gefällt mir

Igor Wallossek

1

13,159 Kommentare 26,153 Likes

Ganz dezent 🙃😉

Antwort 1 Like

Igor Wallossek

1

13,159 Kommentare 26,153 Likes

oops, nicht aufgepasst 😜

Ich tausche das dann aus, halte gerade einen Vortrag 😎

Antwort 3 Likes

Igor Wallossek

1

13,159 Kommentare 26,153 Likes
ipat66

Urgestein

1,791 Kommentare 1,993 Likes

Ich frage mich ernsthaft, wer sich zu dem Preis eine 5070 kauft, wenn es zum gleichem Preis eine 9070XT gibt ... ?
Selbst wenn DLSS einen Ticken besser ist als das FSR 4, würde ich diese Karte never ever der 9070XT vorziehen :)
Hinzu kommt noch der 12Gb Speichergeiz ...
Das Teil dürfte eigentlich keine 400 Euro kosten ...

Antwort 2 Likes

p
passivecool

Veteran

141 Kommentare 89 Likes

Wer produziert in CN und steht demnächst unter 200% Tarif in der US? Ich habe die Hoffnung auf eine Bezahlbare karte nicht ganz aufgegeben. bis dahin: GoT+🍿

Antwort Gefällt mir

L
Legalev

Mitglied

86 Kommentare 72 Likes

für 100€ mehr bekomme ich eine 9070XT mit 16GB Vram und mehr Leistung.
Da brauche ich nicht lange zu überlegen, was ich wohl Kaufen würde.

Antwort 1 Like

leonavis

Veteran

296 Kommentare 158 Likes
Igor Wallossek

1

13,159 Kommentare 26,153 Likes

Lies mal die Einleitung zu den kumulierten FPS und der Indexberechnung. Der Index basiert auf den normlisierten Ergebnissen, ergo sind Spiele mit 300 FPS im Mittel genauso gewichtet wir die mit 50 FPS. Das Zusammenrechnen der FPS ist ein gern gemachter Fehler bei den Prozentberechnungen, da es nun mal falsch ist. Dann müsste man Geomean nehmen. :D

Noch einmal ergänzt, da es sonst untergeht:

Antwort 1 Like

b
bitracer

Urgestein

967 Kommentare 440 Likes

gerade mal bei Geizhals 5070 und 9070 (ohne xt) in den Filter eingegeben. Sortiert nach Preis. Die erste 9070 kam an 19. Stelle.
Um hier überhaupt über eine Radeon-Karte nachzudenken, muß der potentielle Kunde erst einmal wissen, daß es diese gibt.
Zugegeben, das hier bewertete "Gaming-Trio OC" Modell kommt erst auf Seite 2. Also da pokert MSI dementsprechend hoch mit dem Preis, wie alle anderen Hersteller auch mit ihren "premium"-Modellen.

Antwort Gefällt mir

leonavis

Veteran

296 Kommentare 158 Likes

Okay. Also damit ich das richtig verstehe: In der FPS-Grafik werden die FPS von allen Spielen zusammengerechnet und dann durch die Anzahl der Spiele geteilt, in der Prozent-Rechnung wird bei jedem Spiel in Prozent umgerechnet und dann die Prozent zusammenaddiert und durch die Zahl der Spiele geteilt?

Antwort Gefällt mir

Igor Wallossek

1

13,159 Kommentare 26,153 Likes
T
The_Invisible

Mitglied

36 Kommentare 8 Likes

Und für weitere 100eur mehr eine 5070ti die mit der 9070xt in heavy RT/PT den Boden wischt. Wie weit willst das treiben?

Antwort Gefällt mir

L
Legalev

Mitglied

86 Kommentare 72 Likes

Da du leider nicht die einfachsten zusammenhänge erkennst oder in der Lage bist, hier mein Award für dich.

Antwort Gefällt mir

T
The_Invisible

Mitglied

36 Kommentare 8 Likes

Musst dir dann wohl selbst schon verliehen haben, folgt nämlich genau deinem context

Antwort Gefällt mir

Danke für die Spende



Du fandest, der Beitrag war interessant und möchtest uns unterstützen? Klasse!

Hier erfährst Du, wie: Hier spenden.

Hier kannst Du per PayPal spenden.

About the author

Igor Wallossek

Editor-in-chief and name-giver of igor'sLAB as the content successor of Tom's Hardware Germany, whose license was returned in June 2019 in order to better meet the qualitative demands of web content and challenges of new media such as YouTube with its own channel.

Computer nerd since 1983, audio freak since 1979 and pretty much open to anything with a plug or battery for over 50 years.

Follow Igor:
YouTube Facebook Instagram Twitter

Werbung

Werbung