Audio Audio/Peripherals Basics Headphones Microphone Motherboard Reviews

Realtek ALC1200 demystified – what really distinguishes the entry-level sound chip from the larger ALC1220

Today I would like to update you on a detail that is often overlooked in practice, although it is crucial for the correct classification of measured values and manufacturer specifications. This is the distinction between front header and front audio. While the front header refers to the internal pin connector on the mainboard, via which the cable of the housing is connected, front audio refers to the actually accessible sockets on the housing itself. It is only through this connection that the signal provided by the codec – usually port D on the Realtek ALC1200 or ALC1220 – reaches the outside of the mainboard. It is precisely this difference that is important when manufacturers emphasize the “front headphone amplifier” in their marketing, because in reality it is the internal Port-D that is routed to the housing via the header. Or sometimes, unfortunately, not. But you’ll read about that in a moment.

Original article from 20.08.2020

The Realtek ALC1200 is very often found on entry-level and mid-range motherboards and, if you google or interpret the swarm intelligence of the relevant forums, there is also a frightening amount of half-knowledge and ignorance in circulation. Some write of a highly labeled ALC887, others of a slightly slimmed-down ALC1220. And the only correct thing is: both are completely wrong. The larger and higher-quality ALC1220 (2017) is even older, as the ALC1200 only arrived a year later (2018) and is a completely different chip.

However, you can’t compare the ALC1200 with an old ALC887 either, that would be very unfair. Incidentally, the package of the ALC1220 is not larger by chance, because the functionality is too. Nevertheless, the ALC1200 is not garbage. I was also able to obtain the data sheets from a board manufacturer, which Realtek is unfortunately still keeping under lock and key. I hope that today’s article will at least dispel one or two urban legends.

The ALC1200 in detail

The ALC1200 HD audio codec from Realtek is an SoC and an energy-saving 110 dB SNR multi-channel audio codec with lossless DRM, which protects pre-recorded and lossless content and thus enables the full playback of DVD audio and Blu-ray DVD or HD DVD discs. The chip has an integrated 5-volt to 4.5-volt low dropout (LDO) voltage regulator, which guarantees reasonably acceptable analog audio performance without external BOM, and an integrated 3.3-volt to 1.8-volt low dropout voltage regulator, which is used to power internal digital blocks.

The ALC1200 offers a maximum of ten DAC channels supporting simultaneous 7.1-channel playback and two independent stereo output channels (multiple streaming) via the front-panel stereo output (HD audio) with up to 110 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Two stereo ADCs are also integrated and realize multiple analog audio inputs including a 102 dB SNR stereo line-in and a microphone input including microphone arrays with the software functions Acoustic Echo Cancellation (AEC), Beam Forming (BF), Noise Suppression (NS) and Far Field Voice Pick up (FFP).

All analog inputs and outputs can be input and output and all can also be processed via DSP according to user definitions. There are even three integrated headphone amplifiers at the analog output connections (Port-D/Port-E/Port-F). These headphone drivers with high output power deliver up to 30 mW into a 32 ohm load, making an external headphone amplifier superfluous from Realtek’s point of view. Support for 16/20/24-bit SPDIF output with up to 192 kHz sampling rate enables easy connection to HDMI-enabled devices or various consumer electronics such as digital decoders and receivers.

The ALC1200 supports host audio from Intel and AMD chipsets as well as any other HDA-compliant audio controller that conforms to HDA specification 1.0a. Software utilities such as multi-band equalizers, independent software equalizers, dynamic range compressors and expanders, as well as optional third-party software features such as Nahimic 3D, Dolby PCEE, SRS TruSurround HD, SRS Premium Sound, Fortemedia SAM, Creative Host Audio, Synopsys Sonic Focus, DTS Surround Sensation, UltraPC and DTS Connect are supported when licensed.

The differences to the ALC1220

The ALC1220-VB is also a SoC and a high fidelity multi-channel audio codec with bi-lingual interface that supports High Definition Audio 1.0a and the industry standard I2S and I2C. The ALC1220-VB also offers DRM, 10 DAC channels and two channels for multiple streaming. However, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on the front panel is now even up to 120 dB, i.e. 10 dB more. There are also three integrated stereo ADCs instead of just two and the line-in offers up to 110 dB SNR instead of the 102 dB of the smaller ALC 1200.

DRM is also not an issue, but the ALC1220-VB also has a Direct Stream Digital (DSD) decoder and encoder to enjoy DSD stream content and create your own DSD streams with minimal loss of quality through DA and AD converters. The headphone amplifier at Port-D (front panel) is a so-called capacitor-free connection, which eliminates the need for an external coupling capacitor and ensures less distortion and fewer pop effects. This headphone amplifier at port D has a rich output voltage of up to 2.1 Vrms and can drive high-impedance headphones (up to 600 Ω), which is not possible with the ALC1200.

Pin widget overview (simplified representation)

Node ID Port Typical assignment ALC1200 ALC1220
0x14 D Front headphone (HD audio header) 1.1 Vrms, integrated headphone driver, approx. 30 mW @ 32 Ω, SNR approx. 110 dB, no impedance detection up to 2.1 Vrms, dedicated headphone driver, impedance detection 32/150/600 Ω, SNR up to 120 dB
0x15 E Rear line out (or configurable) Line level approx. 1.1 Vrms, SNR approx. 108-110 dB Line level approx. 1.1 Vrms, SNR up to 120 dB
0x16 F Rear line out or surround Line level approx. 1.1 Vrms Line level approx. 1.1 Vrms
0x17 G Center/Sub Line level Line level
0x18 H Rear Surround Line level Line level
0x19 I Side Surround Line level Line level
0x1A J Front Mic (Front Panel) Mic bias, ADC, gain up to 30 dB Mic bias, ADC, gain up to 30 dB
0x1B K Rear Mic or Line In Mic bias or line in, ADC Mic bias or line-in, ADC

Technical explanation and differences between “front audio” and “front header” (Update)

The Realtek ALC1200 and the ALC1220 belong to the same codec family and are pin-compatible, but they differ in the analog output stages, in the signal quality and in the way the ports are used. To fully answer the question, it is important to first clarify how the ports work, the internal architecture and also the distinction between front header and front audio (front connection on the housing).

The ALC1220 provides its own headphone amplifiers at outputs D, E and F. Port D is particularly emphasized because it is fed directly from the so-called front DAC without capacitance, can deliver a higher maximum output voltage of up to 2.1 Vrms and also works with automatic impedance detection, which adjusts the output to 32, 150 or 600 ohms. The data sheet also indicates a maximum signal-to-noise ratio of 120 dB for this output. In contrast, all other ports are at typical line levels of around 1.1 Vrms. This makes port D technically the only output with a genuine, load-stable headphone driver and significantly higher voltage.

The ALC1200 adopts the same port structure and also has headphone drivers at D, E and F. The difference, however, is that only around 1.1 Vrms is achieved here, there is no impedance detection and the signal-to-noise ratio is lower at 110 dB. Although the architecture also provides for port D to act as the front output, the electrical performance is lower. The headphone output on the ALC1200 can provide around 30 mW at 32 ohms, which is sufficient for simple headphones, but lacks the reserves of the ALC1220.

The reason why many manufacturers now place port D on the HD audio header is a direct result of this architecture. The properties of a dedicated headphone output can only be used on Port-D. In the case of the ALC1220, these are the increased output voltage and impedance detection; in the case of the ALC1200, the better load stability of the integrated driver. The rear output on the I/O shield, on the other hand, is usually only operated with standard line levels of around 1.1 Vrms so that connected active loudspeakers or AV devices are not overdriven. The front connection, on the other hand, is the place where headphones are most likely to be plugged in directly, which is why the higher voltage and the driving power amplifier of Port-D are sensibly placed there.

At this point, a clear distinction must be made between the terms front header and front audio. The HD audio header is a connector on the mainboard (typically a 10-pin male connector, often labeled AAFP or HD_AUDIO) to which the cable from the PC case is connected. This cable in turn leads to the front audio sockets, i.e. the jack sockets on the housing itself. The header is therefore the internal interface, while the front audio sockets are the externally accessible ports on the housing. Manufacturers almost always place the electrical port D of the codec on this header so that the sockets on the housing take on the desired function as a headphone output.

There are three ways to determine whether a particular motherboard actually uses Port-D for the front header. Firstly, a so-called codec dump (under Linux or with special tools) provides information. The pin widgets 0x14 to 0x1B are displayed there, with 0x14 being Port-D. The pin default configurations indicate whether this port is designed as a front headphone. Secondly, this can be checked by measurement: If you apply a signal and measure the level at the front header under a 32-ohm load, you can see up to 2 Vrms at the ALC1220, while only around 1.1 Vrms are present at the rear line out. With the ALC1200, both outputs are around 1.1 Vrms, but the load stability of the front header is slightly better. Thirdly, the manufacturer’s specifications also provide information: If the manual or software mentions a Smart Headphone Amp or impedance detection on the front connector, this is a clear indication of Port-D.

In general, Port-D is the dedicated front output in both codecs. With the ALC1220, the higher voltage and impedance detection justify its use on the front header, with the ALC1200 it is more of a pragmatic assignment due to the port logic and load stability. The difference between front header and front audio lies in the fact that the header is only the internal connector on the mainboard, while front audio refers to the actual external housing sockets and their signal content. Whether a specific board uses this connection to port D in this way can only be clarified by a codec dump, measurement or documentation.

By the way, now you also know why I always advise you to connect the headset to the front panel first when testing the mainboard! In general, however, the three (headphone) amplifiers for the output, the I/O shield and the front header for the HD-Auto ALWAYS work separately, whereby port D is always the front audio connection (not to be confused with the front header). Well, it should be. But I’ve also had boards in my hands where this was wired incorrectly on the ALC1220 and port D remained incomprehensibly unused. Unfortunately, this also happens.

Reference to the current ALC4080

In the more recent ALC4080, Realtek has retained the familiar port logic, even though this chip is no longer connected via the classic HD-Audio link but instead works as a standalone USB audio codec. The analog outputs are still designated as Ports A through H, with Port D clearly defined as FRONT. This port is driven directly by the so-called front DAC, features a capacitor-free headphone amplifier, supports automatic impedance detection, and reaches up to 2 Vrms output voltage. Its converter quality is specified at a signal-to-noise ratio of 120 dB. Ports E and F also include integrated headphone amplifiers, but they are designed for linear levels around 1.1 Vrms and achieve a lower quality with 110 dB SNR.

This makes Port D the preferred output for headphones in the ALC4080 as well, which is why motherboard manufacturers almost always connect it to the internal front header with the case jacks. This way, the user benefits at the front from the higher voltage, better load stability, and impedance detection, while the rear jacks remain at line level, complying with the usual standards for active speakers or AV receivers. A comparison with older chips shows the continuity: in the ALC1220, Port D is likewise the only output with up to 2.1 Vrms, impedance detection, and the best SNR, while in the ALC1200 Port D is also intended as the front path but only delivers around 1.1 Vrms and lacks automatic adjustment.

It is important to note that Realtek also offers cut-down variants of the ALC4080. Some implementations omit the full 2 Vrms stage or reduce the number of available amplifiers to save cost and space. Therefore, one should not rely solely on the chip name for a specific motherboard but instead consult the manufacturer’s datasheet or measurement results. Thus, the clear distinction between front header (connector on the board) and front audio (the actual accessible case jacks) remains a crucial detail for the ALC4080 as well.

Summary and conclusion

The ALC is better than its reputation, but also has some clear disadvantages. The codec itself is absolutely fine and a blind test will initially reveal a slightly higher noise floor at most, but this also depends heavily on the external circuitry and the selected gain. It is also a modern chip, although it is of course exactly one price and performance class below the ALC1220. The latter can also cope with higher impedance headphones, at least on the front audio, which is definitely not the case with the ALC1200.

As an end user, you can do without protocols such as I2S and I2C if necessary, but the fact that DSD is completely absent is rather annoying in some situations. Then even the Nubert nuPro X-3000 RC, for example, are of no use, as they could do this but are not supplied. However, if you use the digital output or USB, you generally won’t notice any difference, not counting DSD and other subtleties. The question then remains as to which third-party software, including DTS, is supported. However, this is purely a question of licensing by the board manufacturer and not a hardware feature of the ALC1200.

Kommentar

Lade neue Kommentare

Case39

Urgestein

2,730 Kommentare 1,086 Likes

Danke für den Artikel. Speziell mit dieser Frage, habe ich mich, letzte Woche beschäftigt und mit diesem Artikel endlich eine Antwort bekommen.

Antwort 1 Like

KidStealth

Veteran

310 Kommentare 62 Likes

um das Thema bin ich nach diversen Artikel im letzten 3/4 Jahr auch immer drumherum bei der Boardschau - vielen Dank für die Aufklärung, Igor!

Antwort 1 Like

Corro Dedd

Urgestein

2,094 Kommentare 872 Likes

Mein neues Board hat ja auch den 1220 und obwohl ich klangtechnisch nichts fundiertes dazu sagen kann (dazu ist mein restliches Audioequipment einfach zu mies) klingt er für mich schon ganz gut, den Crystallizer der alten X-FI Auzentech Karte vermisse ich jedenfalls nicht.

Was mich aber extrem stört, ist die mangelnde Funktionalität der Audioconsole: Außer die Anzahl der Kanäle umschalten, eine funktionslose Raumkorrektur (da tut sich akustisch gar nichts und +10dB sollte man am Subwoofer durchaus merken) und noch Abtastrate und Bit-Tiefe einstellen, kann das Teil außer dem absoluten Minimum Balance und Volume GAR NICHTS! :mad:

- Stereo-Upmix? Nope. Und den vermisse ich am meisten. Das krasseste daran? Würde man einen alten Treiber installieren, würde Windows die Funktion auch von selbst wieder anbieten... Aber nun wurde es eben die Software "Equalizer Apo".
- Übergangsfrequenz für den Sub? Nope. Immerhin für den Sub kann ich die obere Grenze festlegen am Amp.
- Kanäle einzelnen Lautsprechern zuweisen? Nope. Gut, das ging beim Original Auzentech Treiber auch nicht, hier brauchte man den DanielK Treiber und mittlerweile habe ich dafür auch keine Notwendigkeit mehr.

Ich war schon beinahe so verzweifelt, diesen Nihimic Krempel zu installieren, der bei vielen mehr Probleme macht als löst. Aber nach vielem hin und her lesen, YouTube Videos und deren Kommentaren schauen, habe ich es dann lieber gelassen (und nachdem mir MSI Creator Center den Dreck automatisch und ungefragt installiert hat auch gleich wieder runtergeschmissen. Inkl. Creator Center, ich HASSE so etwas :mad::mad::mad: ).

Fazit: Es kommt Sound heraus. Wer mehr Einstellungen braucht oder haben will, muss sich trotzdem wieder nach einer dedizierten Lösung umschauen.

Antwort 1 Like

Klicke zum Ausklappem
matmartin

Mitglied

83 Kommentare 30 Likes

Asus behauptet im Marketingmaterial ihr S1220A sei sogar noch besser als der standard ALC1220. Ist da was dran?

Antwort Gefällt mir

L
Loki

Mitglied

85 Kommentare 23 Likes

Schön das mal die Unterschiede erklärt werden. Bin trotzdem etwas verwirrt, da im Handbuch und auf der MSI
Webseite bei dem B550 Tomahawk 1200 angegeben wird und unter AIDA64 / HWINFO 1220 ausgelesen.

Juckt mich jetzt nicht wirklich, da ich eh meine Xonar STX verbaut habe. Was mich bei dem Brett aber gejuckt hat
ist dieser Mist ...

View image at the forums

Muss man wirklich vor dem Kauf eines Boards die Handbücher durchschauen?
Warum bietet man überhaupt ATX mit mehren Anschlüssen an wenn man die eh nicht nutzen kann, da kann man sich auch ein mATX holen -.-

Bin echt auf den Test gespannt, für mich war dieses Board ein Fehlkauf.

Antwort Gefällt mir

Corro Dedd

Urgestein

2,094 Kommentare 872 Likes

@Loki
Das ist ein Problem der begrenzten PCIe Lanes in Consumerhardware, u.A. deswegen habe ich mich auch für den finanziell viel teureren Threadripper entschieden, ansonsten hätte ich wohl auch eher zum 3950X gegriffen (oder erst einen 3300X und später einen 4950X). Im Grunde reicht es wirklich nur für eine Grafikkarte (16x), eine M.2 SSD (4x) und die onboard Peripherie (USB 3 Controller, Audio, WiFi), sowie die PCH. Ende.

Antwort Gefällt mir

L
Loki

Mitglied

85 Kommentare 23 Likes

Mag sein, es sollte aber trotzdem auf den Produktseiten und auf der Verpackung schnell ersichtlich zu erkennen sein das man
nicht alles gleichzeitig nutzen kann. Genau das prangere ich an.

Ich hatte das Problem das meine X99 Plattform leider den Geist aufgegeben hat und ich noch gar nicht vor hatte aufzurüsten.
Aus der Not heraus brauchte ich relativ schnell ein neues Board und Prozessor ... wer ahnt denn das sich in so vielen Jahren
NIX wirklich getan hat ^^

Antwort Gefällt mir

Thy

Urgestein

1,843 Kommentare 746 Likes

Ich betreibe meine Kopfhörer zwar über einen externen DAC, trotzdem gut zu wissen, was die kleinen, aber feinen Unterschiede sind.

Antwort Gefällt mir

McDexter

Mitglied

73 Kommentare 31 Likes

Bin bei der Suche nach Treibern für meine Realtek ALC1220 schon fast verzweifelt.
Beim Bord Hersteller gibt es sie. Sind aber über 1 Jahr alt. Auf der Realtek Seite gibt es einen neueren der läuft aber nicht richtig.
Controllcenter startet nicht.
Auf der China Seite gibt es einen anderen der auch nicht richtig läuft.
Dann gibt es noch einenen eher inoffiziellen, der läuft zwar und auch die Software startet, dafür geht die Raum Korrektur nicht.
Die Sound Qualität war für ein Mainboard eigentlich ziemlich ok.
Habe mir aber inzwischen eine USB Soundkarte von Creative geholt.

PS: Das der Chip (ALC1220) soviel kann wußte ich bis eben auch nicht. Also der Software sieht man das nicht.

Antwort 1 Like

e
eastcoast_pete

Urgestein

3,083 Kommentare 2,046 Likes

Danke Igor! Die Information zum hochohmigen Kopfhörerausgang den es nur mit dem großen Bruder (1220) gibt, ist für mich besonders interessant.
Eine Bitte: welche der derzeitigen AMD oder Intel MBs "wissen nicht, was sie tun", und benützen Port D nicht? Wenn nicht hier im Forum, vielleicht ein "Audio Hall of Shame" Artikel über MBs die es vermasselt haben? Würde ich auf jeden Fall lesen und weiterempfehlen!

Antwort 1 Like

Llares

Mitglied

78 Kommentare 37 Likes

Bessere Bauteile und dadurch, angeblich, besserer Sound.

Richtig. Aufgrund der Komplexität des Routings, bedingt durch die eingeschränkte Anzahl an PCIe-Lanes, gerade bei B550-Brettern, sollte man unbedingt auf Tests warten ordert sich das Handbuch vorher online anschauen.

Gibt es einen konkreten Grund (Fehler), weswegen du unbedingt ein Update brauchst?

Antwort Gefällt mir

McDexter

Mitglied

73 Kommentare 31 Likes

Unbedingt nicht. Lief so weit, bis auf das ab und zu der Sound komplett weg war und nur ein Neustart geholfen hat.
Außerdem sah bei der neuen Version die UI besser aus. Ja ich weiß. Kein echtes Argument für eine neue Version.

Antwort Gefällt mir

Llares

Mitglied

78 Kommentare 37 Likes

Danke für die Info. Fragte, weil manche halt nur Updaten, weil es neuere Treiber gibt. Abstürze sind ja schon ein Grund nach einer Lösung zu suchen.

Antwort 1 Like

L
Locomotion

Mitglied

42 Kommentare 5 Likes

@Igor Wallossek
Nubert nuPro X-3200? Du hattest doch die Nubert nuPro X-3000 RC im Test!

Antwort Gefällt mir

Igor Wallossek

1

13,159 Kommentare 26,153 Likes

Tippfehler :D

Gefunden :D

Antwort Gefällt mir

G
Guest

Danke mal fuer die Zusammenfassung dafuer,
fuer mich leider irrelevant seit mein AVR der DA ist:D

Antwort Gefällt mir

matmartin

Mitglied

83 Kommentare 30 Likes

Laut ASUS Marketingmaterial hochwertigerere Materialien und ein mal stand auch etwas von 113 statt 108 Ohm beim normalen 1220. Genaueres weiß ich aber auch nicht.

Antwort 2 Likes

m
mehmet_b_90

Neuling

5 Kommentare 2 Likes

Danke für die Spende



Du fandest, der Beitrag war interessant und möchtest uns unterstützen? Klasse!

Hier erfährst Du, wie: Hier spenden.

Hier kannst Du per PayPal spenden.

About the author

Igor Wallossek

Editor-in-chief and name-giver of igor'sLAB as the content successor of Tom's Hardware Germany, whose license was returned in June 2019 in order to better meet the qualitative demands of web content and challenges of new media such as YouTube with its own channel.

Computer nerd since 1983, audio freak since 1979 and pretty much open to anything with a plug or battery for over 50 years.

Follow Igor:
YouTube Facebook Instagram Twitter

Werbung

Werbung