Intel has officially confirmed that the upcoming refresh generation of “Arrow Lake” desktop CPUs, marketed as Core Ultra 200S, will offer native support for DDR5 memory with up to 7200 MT/s. An upgrade that seems solid at first glance, but on closer inspection seems less revolutionary and more like a mandatory program to at least keep up with AMD’s Ryzen platforms.

Technically, the whole thing is based on a revised IMC (Integrated Memory Controller) in conjunction with platform optimizations for the familiar LGA 1851 socket. The new CPUs now support up to 7200 MT/s for CUDIMMs (with integrated clock driver ICs), while the values for classic UDIMMs (5600 MT/s) and CSODIMMs (6400 MT/s) remain the same. This corresponds to an increase of 12.5% compared to the previous Arrow Lake models, which allowed a maximum of 6400 MT/s natively with CUDIMM. Nevertheless, there is still a bland aftertaste: there are no new chipsets, only small layout adjustments on Z890 boards, so there is no big leap. The LGA 1851 platform is a discontinued model anyway, as the switch to LGA 1954 is already planned for the second half of 2026, including the introduction of “Nova Lake” CPUs. These will then compete against AMD’s Zen 6 processors and create a new platform foundation.

What remains is a technical polish for a generation that is already struggling with a mixed reputation. The first Arrow Lake launch was, to put it kindly, not the hoped-for liberating blow. Although the refresh models sometimes bring more e-cores, higher clock frequencies and even faster memory, the basic architecture remains the same. Gamers can look forward to marginal gains at best, real performance improvements are more likely to be noticeable in productivity-heavy workloads.
Anyone currently considering an upgrade should therefore weigh things up carefully: Anyone coming from an older platform (e.g. DDR4 and socket LGA 1200/1700) and working a lot with memory-hungry applications will get a solid overall package with the refresh generation. For enthusiasts and early adopters, on the other hand, the refresh is more likely to be a stopgap until the real next generation – or in diplomatic language: a tactical interim solution for the time being.
| Model | Cores/threads | Base clock (P/E) | Boost clock (P/E) | Cache (L3/L2) | DDR5 support | TDP (PL1/PL2) | Price (RRP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core Ultra 9 290K Plus | 24 (8P 16E) | 3.7 / 3.2 GHz | 5.6 / 4.8 GHz | 36 MB / 40 MB | DDR5-7200 | 125W / 250W | tba |
| Core Ultra 9 285K | 24 (8P 16E) | 3.7 / 3.2 GHz | 5.5 / 4.6 GHz | 36 MB / 40 MB | DDR5-6400 | 125W / 250W | $589 |
| Core Ultra 7 270K Plus | 24 (8P 16E) | 3.7 / 3.2 GHz | 5.5 / 4.7 GHz | 36 MB / 40 MB | DDR5-7200 | 125W / 250W | tba |
| Core Ultra 7 265K | 20 (8P 12E) | 3.9 / 3.3 GHz | 5.4 / 4.6 GHz | 30 MB / 36 MB | DDR5-6400 | 125W / 250W | $394 |
| Core Ultra 7 265KF | 20 (8P 12E) | 3.9 / 3.3 GHz | 5.4 / 4.6 GHz | 30 MB / 36 MB | DDR5-6400 | 125W / 250W | $379 |
| Core Ultra 5 250K Plus | 18 (6P 12E) | 4.2 / 3.5 GHz | 5.3 / 4.7 GHz | 24 MB / 26 MB (?) | DDR5-7200 | 125W / 159W | tba |
| Core Ultra 5 245K | 14 (6P 8E) | 4.2 / 3.6 GHz | 5.2 / 4.6 GHz | 24 MB / 26 MB | DDR5-6400 | 125W / 159W | $309 |
| Core Ultra 5 245KF | 14 (6P 8E) | 4.2 / 3.6 GHz | 5.2 / 4.6 GHz | 24 MB / 26 MB | DDR5-6400 | 125W / 159W | $294 |
Source: Uniko’s Hardware

































4 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Veteran
Veteran
Urgestein
Veteran
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →