Putty Details

< Back to Overview

Paste Hardwareliebe Extreme64

Product Images

General Information

Manufacturer
Hardwareliebe
Designation
Extreme64

Manufacturer Specifications

Accessories
Spatuala, gloves
Container
Can
Container
Can

Notes and Recommendations

Usability
Conclusion
Good and above average working thermal putty, very similar to Laird Tputty 607 OEM. Recommended.

Measurements

Thermal Conductivity (W/m·K)
7.5
Min BLT
172
Interface Resistance
30.8
Heat Conducting Particles and Matrix
Al2O3, ZnO, Silicone
Particle Size
<25 µm

Material Testing and TIMA Protocol (on request)

Microscopy and Particles

Measurement Process



Thermal Resistances Rth

Thermal resistance Rth correlates linearly with layer thickness, unlike thermal conductivity, which follows a non-linear curve. Layer thicknesses below 1000 µm are typically relevant for memory, whereas VRM applications may range from 1500 µm to 3000 µm depending on the heatsink design.

I have compiled a bar chart comparing relevant layer thicknesses from 250 to 3000 µm for Rth.

Minimum Possible Layer Thickness

This is exactly why I wanted to find out how far one can go with a bit of pressure and how much a putty can still be compressed. Here, I use the usual 9N pro cm², which is more than sufficient and exceeds the pressure typically achieved by, for example, a GPU cooler.

Effective Thermal Conductivity and Cooling Simulation

If Rth is already available, one wouldn't actually need λeff, the effective thermal conductivity. We can also observe how the values change across the BLT, although one cannot expect a linear curve due to the included area and BLT.

I have again illustrated the relevant layer thicknesses from 250 to 3000 µm as a bar chart for λeff for comparison.

DRAM Simulation

VRM Simulation

Werbung

Werbung